How the Interim Budget Shapes the Electoral Landscape: An Insightful Analysis

There is nothing to address this question succinctly. Ultimately, there aren’t any major populist pronouncements. It simply restates the 24×7 political-economic plan, which has so far shown to be quite successful for the Narendra Modi government, is the somewhat longer and more accurate response. These are the principal features of this plan. Over the course of its ten years in office, the current government has established a complex and well-organized system of welfare programs and fostered a sizable population of voters who are financially obligated and have become known as “labharthis” (beneficiaries). Welfare recipients are by no means a new demographic in India, but the BJP’s political brilliance is found in the way it has constructed a political conduit over the past ten years between this sizable underclass and the Prime Minister, who represents practically all of the party’s political capital.

Building this highway has been made possible in large part by the fact that, as a result of the Jan Dhan, Aadhaar, and Mobile (JAM) trinity, practically all welfare distribution in India now occurs via the direct benefit transfer (DBT) method. For many groups, the budget is merely another day in their lives filled with political discourse. The Prime Minister and the BJP’s political messaging is immediate and unrelenting whenever they receive a social benefit, which could be as minor as a few kilograms of rice or as major as a new house. The government’s intention to capitalize on the new demographic crop of “labharthis” who are waiting to be obliged is evident in the interim budget’s extension of various programs, such as the rural housing plan, which saw a significant increase in the number of houses built.

In fact, the BJP has been astute enough to create programs that, without using a single penny from the budgetary reserves, have given it political legitimacy for aiding the underprivileged. One such programme is Lakhpati Didi, where the number of beneficiaries who are targeted has increased by 10 million. The credit belongs to the government and hence the BJP, but the money is all from banks (despite government guarantee). As a result, it does not increase the government’s financial burden.

The budget speech’s mention of the only four “castes” worth concentrating on: farmers, the impoverished, women, and youth, demonstrates the BJP’s intention to use these welfare programs to thwart any political attempt to revive Mandal politics and unite voters from other backward classes (OBCs) against it in the run-up to the 2024 elections. Social justice was mostly a political catchphrase in the past. The finance minister stated in her statement that social justice is an efficient and essential form of governance for our government. There was no way to have expressed it more clearly.

Strategic Economic Narratives and Fiscal Policies: Bolstering BJP’s Electoral Prospects

Building narratives is the budget’s second key political component. Setting the economic narrative has taught the BJP lessons. The party experienced a shocking setback in the 2004 general elections, which were fought on the economic hubris of the “India Shining” campaign. Instead of the “it’s your fault if you cannot feel it” attitude of “India Shining,” it offers prosperity and well-being as a work in progress that will only materialize if the BJP stays in power.In addition, it takes advantage of the past performance of its predecessor to capitalize on what is known as retroactive anti-incumbency. The budget speech makes another attempt to do just that when it refers to India being in the “fragile five” in 2014 due to “the mismanagement of those (UPA) years.”

Additionally, the government’s economic narrative captivates voters with a thousand details rather than depending on a single, decisive statistic. Examples of this type of infrastructure include airports, Vande Bharat trains, rivalry between major religious tourism destinations, and the sale of tax disputes involving sums as small as ₹25,000 or even ₹10,000. The average macro economist may get bored with these nuggets, but the lay voter base is kept engaged and satisfied, and the number of voters who have been directly obligated by the government in one way or another rises as a result.

The last, but certainly not least, concern is the impact of this budget on the capital, a constituency that is crucial to the elections but is numerically minor. The government has sent a very strong message to Indian capital through its adherence to the fiscal glide path, its focus on capital expenditure, its provision of up to a trillion rupees in interest-free loans over a 50-year period to private entities for the purpose of scientific research, its assurance that tax holidays for entities like sovereign wealth funds are maintained during election years, and its subtly expressed satisfaction that inflation is within the “target band” of 2%-6%, despite the Reserve Bank of India’s insistence that it stabilize at the real target of 4%.  These steps will lower operating costs, calm concerns about inflation, and—most importantly—open up formerly restricted segments of the Indian economy to private investment. This implies that large corporations will gladly wager on the political steadiness and policy consistency that the BJP guarantees.

Also Read: Union Minister Asserts: Being a Fintech Doesn’t Exempt Anyone Amid Paytm Crisis

Final Thought

The economic strategy of the Narendra Modi government is summed up in both the most recent budget and its earlier policies. It exhibits a deft combination of welfare populism and calculated economic planning meant to build a wide base of support and encourage investment and growth. In the last ten years, the government has methodically constructed a web of welfare programs that not only provide for the basic needs of a large underclass but also establish a direct political conduit between the Prime Minister and the recipients (labharthis). This has allowed the government to gain a devoted support base by effectively utilizing the Jan Dhan, Aadhaar, and Mobile (JAM) trinity for direct benefit transfers (DBT).

Expanding schemes such as the rural housing plan and the creative Lakhpati Didi project is a prime example of the government’s two-pronged strategy of improving welfare without piling too much strain on the fiscal budget and strategically employing banking resources to gain political capital. This approach has strengthened the BJP’s standing with the traditionally marginalized segments of society and placed it in a defensive position against any return to caste politics by concentrating on common themes of development for women, youth, farmers, and the impoverished.

Furthermore, the narrative-building element of the budget, which places a strong emphasis on continued prosperity and well-being, departs from previous economic arrogance and positions the BJP as the champion of unceasing advancement. The government deftly balances the expectations and complaints of the people by emphasizing its accomplishments and drawing comparisons with the alleged shortcomings of earlier administrations, all the while upholding a narrative of stability and advancement.

The budget also makes a strong statement to the capital markets and the larger business community by highlighting capital expenditure, fiscal restraint, and incentives for private R&D spending. The government’s commitment to preserving an inviting investment climate is demonstrated by these steps, which are intended to reassure investors, encourage private sector involvement, and guarantee policy continuity.