Connect with us

Politics

“Betrayal In Baramati”: Mahayuti’s NCP Leader Hints at Trouble, Ajit Pawar Ignores Important NDA Meeting

Mahayuti

“Betrayal In Baramati”: Mahayuti’s NCP Leader Hints at Trouble, Ajit Pawar Ignores Important NDA Meeting

A MLC from Ajit Pawar’s NCP on Wednesday demonstrated that the Mahayuti didn’t cooperate in the Baramati Lok Sabha body electorate, which was held by sitting MP Supriya Sule, who was facing sister by marriage Sunetra Pawar. In another huge turn of events, in the mean time, Maharashtra vice president Ajit Pawar will avoid the NDA meeting at 4 p.m., sources said.

Considering Baramati an “embarrassing loss, NCP (AP) representative Amol Mitkari said: “Our union accomplices didn’t work for us. Baramati is an embarrassing loss. Anyone will feel annoyed with this loss… We host a gathering meeting on Friday, and I will raise this issue.”

Defeating the test presented by her alienated cousin, Sule enrolled in a resonating triumph in the NCP stronghold, winning by more than 1.55 lakh votes. She won over Sunetra Pawar, who is Ajit Pawar’s significant other and a political debutante, in the fight that had turned into the most high-profile challenge in the state.
Sule surveyed 7,32,312 votes, while Sunetra collected 5,73,979 votes. Her cousin Ajit defied her dad Sharad Pawar last year and split the party, but at the same time is known to partake in a ton of help in Baramati; thus, numerous political onlookers have said she will find it challenging to win the fourth continuous term.

WIFE’S Misfortune A Difficulty for AJIT PAWAR?
For Ajit, his significant other’s loss could end up being a significant political difficulty, particularly as it comes straight after his resistance and right in front of the get-together races planned for in a little while this year. His child, Parth Pawar, had additionally lost as the applicant of the unified NCP from the Maval body electorate in the 2019 general decisions.

The high-power Baramati challenge had individuals from the Pawar family exchanging insults. The two groups investigated every possibility as Sharad Pawar contacted citizens himself, while Ajit held various public gatherings.

Sule drove in practically all gathering portions—BBaramati, Indapur, Daund, Bhor, and Purandar. Laborers of the NCP (SP) began praising her success much before the outcome was formally declared.

Also Read: In this movie, 13 years before winning the Lok Sabha elections, Chirag Paswan fell in love with Kangana Ranaut

“I’m grateful to individuals in Baramati. After the triumph, our aggregate liabilities have expanded. Forget about the past. Anything that occurred during the decisions didn’t befit Maharashtra’s governmental issues, and it ought to be kept away from in the impending state races, and for that, we will avoid potential risk,” she said.

She further said it was everybody’s liability to maintain the aan, baan, shaan (honor, pride, and distinction) and culture of Maharashtra during decisions. “We maintained that practice in these decisions and will keep on maintaining it in the impending races,” she said, adding that the specialists who remained by her dad in this basic stage were the party’s genuine strength.

Advertisement

Connect with us on Instagram and WhatsApp

Politics

Opposition MPs Led by Rahul Gandhi Wave Constitution Copies as PM Modi Takes Oath | WATCH

Opposition

Opposition MPs Led by Rahul Gandhi Wave Constitution Copies as PM Modi Takes Oath | WATCH

As Prime Minister Narendra Modi prepared to take the oath of office as a member of the 18th Lok Sabha, opposition MPs led by Congressman Rahul Gandhi presented him copies of the Constitution. Similar greetings were extended to Union Home Minister Amit Shah. Leaders of the Samajwadi Party Akhilesh Yadav and Awadhesh Prasad, Congressman Rahul Gandhi, and Trinamool politician Kalyan Banerjee occupied the front row in the opposition benches.

The INDIA group, which is made up of the Congress party and its pre-election allies, waged a fierce campaign against Prime Minister Modi, threatening to abolish the Constitution if the BJP is returned to power with a two-thirds majority. Political analysts speculate that statements made by certain BJP candidates and their slogan, “400 paar,” aided the opposition’s narrative. Rahul Gandhi declared that they were not at all comfortable with Prime Minister Modi and Home Minister Amit Shah undermining the Constitution.

In the Parliament complex, he told reporters, “We would not allow the attack on the Constitution that Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Amit Shah are doing.” Gandhi declared, “We will not stand for this attack.” On being asked if the opposition’s message was getting through to the public, the former president of the Congress responded, “Our message is reaching the public and no power can touch the Constitution of India and we will protect it.”

Also Read: Kharge Criticizes PM Modi for Bringing Up ‘Emergency’: “How Long Do You Plan to Rule?”

“Copy of the Constitution in hands, its values in hearts!” Gandhi wrote beside the video of their symbolic protest that they shared on social media. “India will defend it with all of its might; no power in the world can destroy it.” Monday marked Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s oath of office as a member of the 18th Lok Sabha, following his return to power earlier this month for a record third term. In the Lok Sabha, Modi has held three terms. He kept his seat in Varanasi, which he has been winning since 2014. He took the oath of office first, in his capacity as Leader of the House.

Connect with us on Instagram and WhatsApp

Continue Reading

Politics

Kharge Criticizes PM Modi for Bringing Up ‘Emergency’: “How Long Do You Plan to Rule?”

Kharge

Kharge Criticizes PM Modi for Bringing Up ‘Emergency’: “How Long Do You Plan to Rule?”

In response to Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s remarks on Monday concerning emergencies, Congress President Mallikarjun Kharge questioned how long the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) intended to remain in power. “He’ll repeat this one hundred times. You are doing this without formally declaring an emergency. How much longer do you want to dominate by discussing this? It was reported that Kharge said

Prime Minister Narendra Modi addressed the media outside the new Parliament building earlier today and discussed the emergency before taking the oath of office as an MP. Speaking of the 21 months of emergency that were imposed during Indira Gandhi’s presidency, Modi said that the younger generation in India would never forget that period when the nation was turned into a jail and that they would take steps to create a vibrant democracy to ensure that such actions are never taken in India again.

Tomorrow is June 25th. June 25th marks the 50th anniversary of the stain placed on India’s democracy. The new Indian generation will never forget that democracy was stifled, the nation was converted into a prison, and the Indian Constitution was utterly rejected,” he declared. Kharge later claimed in a different tweet that while Prime Minister Modi was reminding people about the 50-year-old emergency, they had forgotten about the previous ten years’ “undeclared emergency.”

“You remind us of the 50-year-old Emergency, but have forgotten the recent 10-year Undeclared Emergency, which was ended by the people,” Kharge said on X. “The public has spoken out against Modi ji. In spite of this, he ought to work if he is to become prime minister.People want content, not catchphrases; keep this in mind for yourself.

Also Read: Supreme Court Delays Decision on Arvind Kejriwal Bail Pending Delhi HC Order

According to Kharge, Modi gave a lengthier than usual traditional speech, but “the arrogance remains, even after the moral and political defeat.” The country was hoping that Modi would address some of the major challenges, he continued. According to Kharge, “He did not take any responsibility for the massive rigging and corruption of his government, but he will show some sympathy towards the youth regarding the paper leak in NEET and other recruitment examinations.”

Connect with us on Instagram and WhatsApp

Continue Reading

Politics

Supreme Court Delays Decision on Arvind Kejriwal Bail Pending Delhi HC Order

Arvind Kejriwal

Supreme Court Delays Decision on Arvind Kejriwal Bail Pending Delhi HC Order

Arvind Kejriwal, the chief minister of Delhi, moved against the High Court’s temporary stay of a trial court ruling giving him bail in a money laundering case related to the purported excise scam, but the Supreme Court on Monday denied him relief. The highest court stated, “We will be prejudging the issue if we pass an order now.” Following Kejriwal’s bail award from the trial court on June 20, the Delhi High Court on Friday postponed his release. If the federal anti-money laundering agency hadn’t received an interim stay of action from the high court, the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) national convener, who was detained by the Enforcement Directorate (ED) on March 21, would have been able to leave Tihar jail on Friday.

A high court vacation bench had stated, “Until the pronouncement of this order, the operation of the impugned order shall remain stayed,” and requested written responses from the parties by June 24. The plea hearing was scheduled for July 10 by the top court. In order to review all of the case files, the court had stated that it would be delaying the order for two to three days. It also sent Kejriwal a notice asking him to reply to the ED’s plea contesting the trial court’s June 20 bail decision.

In his high court appearance, Additional Solicitor General (ASG) S V Raju argued on behalf of the ED that the trial court’s ruling was “perverse,” “one-sided,” and “wrong-sided,” and that the conclusions were based on unrelated evidence. He asserted that the special judge disregarded the pertinent information. Raju had argued that the ED was not given enough time to present its case and was seeking a stay of the trial court’s judgment.

Senior attorneys Abhishek Singhvi and Vikram Chaudhari, who were defending Kejriwal, fiercely fought the ED’s request for a stay of execution. They had argued that the ED, for which an individual’s liberty is a low priority, is not covered by Article 21 of the Constitution, which guarantees protection of life and personal liberty.

Also Read: Modi 3.0’s First Parliament Session: Opposition Armed with LS Mandate, NEET Controversy, and Key Wins Eyes ‘Acche Din’

In granting bail, the trial judge determined that Kejriwal’s guilt was not yet proven and that the ED had not shown concrete evidence connecting him to the money laundering case’s proceeds of crime. The excise policy was discontinued in 2022 as a result of the lieutenant governor of Delhi requesting that the CBI look into claims of corruption and irregularities in its creation and implementation.

Connect with us on Instagram and WhatsApp

Continue Reading

Trending